The announcement of the Atari 2600+
The announcement of the Atari 2600++ has left many retro gaming fans feeling disappointed and confused. The announcement of the Atari console is accompanied by a list of classic games, but many users express dismay at the lack of functionality and features of the device.
“Atari is rehashing their old games and trying to cash in on nostalgia.” “The games are unplayable and not fun by today’s standards.” “Why would anyone want this?” These are just a few of the statements from our readers in response to the Atari 2600+ announcement.
There are certainly mixed feelings about the viability of the upcoming console, which allows players to play both a selection of Atari 2600 games on physical cartridges, and the company’s back catalogue of games via the included virtual console. Some users agree that the console’s games are better left as memories, and that Atari should focus on developing games for current systems.
“If they are going to release a retro console, why not just a Nintendo Switch version with all the games preloaded?” “Given the mixed reception of their recent releases, I’m not sure why anyone would expect anything from Atari.” “Atari should have gone with the retro plug and play idea. This is just a cash grab.”
However, the fact that the forthcoming Atari console allows for original cartridges to be used is seen as a positive, as is the inclusion of the ability to play Atari 2600 games via the included virtual console.
“I would rather buy original cartridges than have to emulate them. It’s not just about playing the game, but supporting the developer as well.” “The fact that it plays original cartridges is a huge plus.” “They’re gonna make me buy all these games again? Well I guess if I can play them on this then I’m down.”
Cost is a major factor for many potential buyers, with many expressing dissatisfaction with the pricing and number of included games.
“I’ll definitely buy it if they’re under $100.” “At $150, I’ll get one, but if they start pushing it up over $200, I’d rather just build my own PC.” “$100 is the sweet spot. Anything more than that, no way.” “I’d rather have the Switch version with old games preloaded.”
The lack of multiplayer features and internet connectivity also raises concerns, with some users expressing a desire for a similar Nintendo console that would allow for both pre-loaded games and the use of cartridges.
“I’d rather have the Switch version with old games preloaded.” “Couldn’t they have added an online multiplayer mode?” “Nintendo should make this.” “I’m still hoping for a Switch version of this that allows both pre-loaded games and the use of cartridges.”
There are a few people who mention the appeal of physical media and the tactile nature of retro gaming consoles, while others mention the potential advantages of being able to use a Genesis controller and the compatibility with the Harmony flash cart. The announcement of paddle controllers is also met with excitement.
Many users acknowledge that these games were difficult when they were first released, and see the appeal in being able to revisit them and give them another try. Some see the nostalgia factor as a reason for potential interest in the Atari 2600+.
“I’m still making the mistake of trying to play these games as I would a modern game. I need to go into it with the mind of a child and just have fun with them.” “I’m really looking forward to playing these games again, but this time I’m going to keep my expectations in check.” “I’m excited about the paddle controllers and the arcade games.”
Of course, many of our readers question the technical aspects of the console. They ask whether it uses a software emulator or an FPGA, and express curiosity about how the games will look on modern digital displays compared to the CRTs of old.
If nothing else, the Atari 2600+ announcement has certainly got people talking. We’ll bring you more news on the upcoming console as we get it, so keep checking back with us. In the meantime, check out the best retro games you can play on your current console.
