The comparison between Homelander in MK1 and COD WZ
A comparison between the visuals of Homelander in Mortal Kombat 11 (MK1) and Call of Duty: Warzone (COD WZ) sparks debate, with some users arguing that having a bulletproof character in a shoot-each-other-with-bullets game like COD WZ doesn’t make sense. Others point out that video games often prioritize entertainment over logic for the sake of gameplay, while making a case for MK1’s fighting game logic as an exception.
The argument is made that pitting comic book characters against each other in a fighting game like MK1 is more acceptable than a bulletproof character being killed by an army soldier with a gun in COD WZ.
“Superman has been defeated in other games,” one user points out, “but it’s different when a regular human can defeat him with bare hands in COD WZ.” Another counters this by mentioning that Superman has been defeated in other games, but the differences in fighting style and the visual differences between Homelander and Omni Man are brought up. The comparison between CGI trailers and gameplay is questioned for its fairness, with some users expressing their preference for the appearance of MK1 Homelander.
The difference in visuals between MK1 and COD WZ can be attributed to the different engines and challenges each game faces, but the difference between CGI trailers and gameplay is questioned for its fairness. Some users also express their disappointment with the inclusion of Homelander in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (MW2), while others point out the silliness of some of COD WZ’s past skins.
“Reddit logic and reasoning are always lacking,” one user quips. Another shares an anecdote about someone who didn’t understand the concept of performance limitations in game development until it was explained to them.
Check out the full discussion for yourself in the comments below:
Alternatively, you can take a look at some of the other big features coming to MK1, or maybe fill up your library with the best fighting games on PC.
