Critics and Supporters Clash Over Gaming Articles
A debate has erupted over the value and quality of gaming articles, with one user suggesting that they should be blacklisted or even made illegal. This user claims that gaming articles are often filled with what they consider to be 'clickbait' and excessive filler content, which they believe is an attempt to deceive readers. However, other users argue that the article in question is no different from countless other gaming articles found on the internet. They assert that the original commenter is simply expressing frustration due to being compelled to click on a specific piece.
The original commenter highlights an article about a game released on the PS4 as a prime example of their grievances. They specifically reference the motion blur controversy and assert that the article should have provided a direct answer to their specific question without unnecessary elaboration.
“This is exactly what I’m talking about,” they express. “Why can’t these sites simply provide a straightforward response instead of wasting time with explanations and assumptions? This should have been addressed long ago.”
In response, other users argue that the article in question is not markedly different from other gaming articles found online. Some users even offer examples of articles they consider to be clickbait and filled with excessive filler, but defend articles like the one under scrutiny for providing at least some useful information.
“Show me one that isn’t,” the original commenter challenges. They then refer to an article about a recently released game on the PS4 as a perfect illustration of their point. Additionally, they mention the motion blur controversy and argue that the article should have promptly addressed their specific query without unnecessary digressions.
Discussion ensues regarding the motivations behind clickbait articles and the significance of compelling headlines in attracting readers. “Yet, people continue to fall for it time and time again,” one user remarks.
Another user points out, “There are articles that are laden with excessive filler and assumptions. Like the one in the original post, it pretends to have all the answers, but it doesn't. By making assumptions about the effects of motion blur on gameplay, it becomes challenging to find accurate information.”
“That's the whole idea behind clickbait,” another user responds. “We know it won't simply provide us with the answer, but we still click on it because we want to learn more.”
Briefly, the conversation shifts to the smudging issue in a different game and the desire for its release on PC. “It's just another example of clickbait,” the original commenter remarks. “I don't appreciate seeing a headline like 'Is this game coming to PC?' only to find an article that says 'We're working on it, but we can't provide any additional information.'”
One user mentions that the article in question is from game8 and acknowledges its comprehensiveness compared to other sources. “Ah, the nostalgia for fully fleshed out Wikis,” another user responds. “At least game8 is considered a more reliable alternative.”
